UNCGNews

News Items from UNC Greensboro

Kathelen SMith, Dr. Lisa Levenstein, and Dr. Mandy Cooper look at artifacts and archived material on suffrage
Smith, Levenstein, and Cooper look at artifacts about the women's suffrage movement on State Normal's campus
Kathelene McCarty Smith, Dr. Lisa Levenstein, and Dr. Mandy Cooper

One hundred and one years ago, the 19th Amendment to the Constitution was passed, guaranteeing and protecting women’s right to vote.

On August 18, 1920, after a nearly century-long fight, Tennessee became the 36th and final state approval needed to ratify the amendment.

How far have women’s rights come since then? How has the activism of the suffragists inspired the activism we see today?

Last year, we spoke with Dr. Mandy Cooper, a historian and a lecturer of women’s history at UNC Greensboro, to answer these questions in honor of the women’s suffrage centennial. Read the Q&A.

But what did the movement look like on UNCG’s campus 101 years ago?

Dr. Cooper, Dr. Lisa Levenstein, professor of history and director of the Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies program, and Kathelene McCarty Smith, interim head of the Martha Blakeney Hodges Special Collections and University Archives, explain. 

At State Normal and Industrial College, now UNCG:

 “The young women were very serious about women’s right’s issues,” says Smith when describing the students of State Normal and Industrial College in regard to their involvement in the women’s suffrage movement.

The first true suffrage event on campus took place in 1915 when 250 students participated in a march during their regular afternoon “walking period.” This march, led by members of the orchestra and students with makeshift instruments, paraded down College Avenue with “Votes for Women” banners flying high. The protest ended at Spencer Dormitory, where the women listened to speeches on women’s rights given by their fellow students.

At the 1915 commencement exercises, students refused to applaud the speaker, Governor Locke Craig, because he spoke against women’s suffrage. It was only after Governor Craig conceded that he would support women’s right to vote if that is what they desired that he received a positive response from his audience. 

On another occasion, an alumna from the Class of 1915 recalled that after one particularly offensive speech during which the speaker suggested that women leave the vote to men, the students created an effigy of the unfortunate legislator and burned it in Peabody Park. The same year, the students formed a suffrage group on campus, which is thought to have been the first of its kind in the South.

In 1918, 575 of the 650 students on campus signed a petition to be sent to their senators advocating for women’s suffrage. This petition received a great deal of publicity, resulting in one state paper commenting, “The action of these young women have had much to do with bringing the North Carolina State Normal College into prominence as representatively progressive and reflecting Twentieth-century ideals and revised standards.” Several months later, Julius Foust, president of State Normal, wrote to Senator Lee Overman supporting the movement, reflecting the sentiment of most of the faculty.

During these politically active years, State Normal was fortunate to have many strong suffrage advocates speak to the student body, such as Jeannette Rankin, the first woman to serve in the United States Congress, and Dr. Anna Shaw, president of the National American Suffrage Association. Shaw spoke at the school on three occasions, including giving the 1919 commencement address. She felt that the spirit of the State Normal students was “inspiring and unique.” Her connection to State Normal was such that she would ultimately leave the college scholarship funds in her will. The college named a dormitory in Shaw’s honor in 1921.

The students at State Normal were leaders in the movement. There were multiple women’s colleges in the state, but most were connected to religious denominations, so State Normal students may have felt more free to speak out on politics.

“I think our students were pioneers. They were lauded for being the most active women’s college in the state for wartime mobilization during World War I, and they put that same energy into their interest in suffrage,” says Smith.

Faculty members like political science professor Harriet Elliott helped students make their voices heard and shared new ideas that the students may not have been learning about in their church or at their family dinner table. 

“She encouraged the students to think of themselves as part of a broader world,” said Smith. “Many alumnae credited Elliott with helping them gain a fundamental understanding of the suffrage movement and its relationship to the political and economic climate of the day.”

In the state and beyond:

In North Carolina, women’s suffrage had a large deal of support by the time Congress passed the amendment in 1919, including by the Southern Baptist Conference, the Southern Methodist General Conference, the North Carolina Farmers Union, a large number of women’s organizations, and almost all of the mainstream newspapers in the state.

North Carolina suffragists were active in the fight both nationally and at the state level, including those at State Normal and Industrial School. In fact, the North Carolina Woman’s Suffrage Association was founded in 1894, only two years after the school first opened its doors. Suffragists in North Carolina were more likely to have received a college education and to hold or have held a job outside of their homes.

One major figure in North Carolina’s suffrage movement was Gertrude Weil of Goldsboro, the president of the North Carolina Equal Suffrage Association. She kept up a correspondence with national leaders like Carrie Chapman Catt, the president of the National American Woman Suffrage Association (NAWSA).

But, there were many in the state who opposed suffrage. Many anti-suffragists declared that “politics are bad for women and women are bad for politics.” Many anti-suffragists came from more wealthy families – landowners, textile mill owners, and those associated with railroads. And unlike their political counterparts, anti-suffragists in North Carolina were less likely to have received a college education and to hold or have held a job outside of their home.

Anti-suffrage was more popular in the eastern part of North Carolina, where there was a higher African American population. Many white North Carolinians feared the loss of white supremacy if African Americans could vote, so they campaigned against women’s suffrage out of a fear of a larger number of African American voters.

“This white supremacist rhetoric was a common feature of the women’s suffrage movement on the local, state, national, and international levels,” says Cooper. “In fact, both pro and anti-suffragists used white supremacist rhetoric to advance their cause.” 

After the 19th Amendment passed Congress in June 1919, it went to the states for ratification. Ultimately, it came down to North Carolina and Tennessee as the 36th state necessary to ratify the amendment. Despite the support for suffrage in the state, the amendment was losing ground. Gertrude Weil reported to renowned suffragist Carrie Chapman Catt that the suffrage amendment had lost so much ground in North Carolina that the odds were only about 50/50. In early August 1920, 63 members of the North Carolina House sent a telegram to the Tennessee House asking them not to ratify the amendment and pledging not to ratify it themselves. Tennessee did ratify the amendment on August 18, becoming the 36th state to do so. Meanwhile, the North Carolina Senate voted to table the debate on the amendment until the 1921 session, a motion that passed 25 to 23, effectively ending any chance that North Carolina would be the final state in the ratification process. Although North Carolina didn’t technically reject the 19th Amendment in 1920 because the senate tabled the bill, the state also didn’t ratify it until 1971, over 50 years later. The only state to wait longer was Mississippi, which ratified the bill in 1984.

How did the movement inspire present-day activism?

“The fight for the right to vote didn’t end with the passage of the 19th Amendment,” says Levenstein. “Black women didn’t secure their rights until the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. And today, we are seeing an intensification of attacks on our democracy in North Carolina and elsewhere. Many UNCG students are involved in these and other social justice struggles, continuing the decades-long quest for democratic participation and equality for all.” 

Read anecdotes from students from 1918 about the right to vote at UNCG Magazine
For She Can We Can Beyond the Women’s Suffrage Centennial events, visit provost.uncg.edu/shecanwecan.

Archived materials and photos from State Normal and Industrial College 1914-1916
Archived materials and photos from State Normal and Industrial College 1914-1916
Archived materials, books, and photos from State Normal and Industrial College and around the state
A letter President Julius Foust wrote to Senator Lee Overman in 1918 supporting the movement, reflecting the sentiment of most of the faculty
A letter President Julius Foust wrote to Senator Lee Overman in 1918 supporting the movement, reflecting the sentiment of most of the faculty
A portrait of suffragist Anna Howard Shaw and a copy of her book, signed and given to the students at State Normal and Industrial College after speaking at commencement in 1919.
A portrait of suffragist Anna Howard Shaw and a copy of her book,”The Story of a Pioneer,” signed and given to the students at State Normal and Industrial College after speaking at commencement in 1919.
“I the hope of a the dawn of a new freedom for women and the triumph of justice. Your friend, Anna Howard Shaw" Dated May 20th, 1919.
“Yours in the hope of the dawn of a new freedom for women and the triumph of justice. Your friend, Anna Howard Shaw” Dated May 20th, 1919.
Resolution in support of the enfranchisement of women by the North Carolina Federation fo Women's Clubs signed by chemistry faculty
Resolution in support of the enfranchisement of women by the North Carolina Federation of Women’s Clubs, signed by Mary M. Petty, head of the chemistry department at State Normal.
State Normal students' letter to Dr. Anna Howard Shaw for her birthday
In 1918, State Normal students sent greetings and roses to Dr. Anna Howard Shaw for her 70th birthday, and this was her reply, thanking the students and expressing her interest to visit for commencement.
Excerpt from State Normal Magazine
Excerpt from State Normal Magazine

Story by Dr. Mandy Cooper, Dr. Lisa Levenstein, Kathelene McCarty Smith, and Alexandra McQueen
Photography by Jiyoung Park, University Communication
s, and archived material courtesy of University Libraries

 
Share This